Delegation discussion summary
Dick Hardt
dick at sxip.com
Sun Oct 15 03:57:04 UTC 2006
On 14-Oct-06, at 8:45 PM, Scott Kveton wrote:
>>> I kinda get "homesite", but I don't understand the thinking behind
>>> "membersite": What is this site supposed to be a "member" of?
>>
>> It was a member of the network of sites running the protocol.
>
> "Membersite" sounds too much like you have to join some club to
> participate.
> I feel the same way about "homesite". I'm all for finding more
> consumer-friendly terminology for this but I've yet to hear
> anything that
> rings true.
Just to clarify, I was providing where "Membersite" came from, not
promoting we use the term.
>
> In the case of http you have "web server" which is served up by a
> "web site"
> ... Instead of "http provider" and "http destination" ... Maybe we
> need to
> make this even simpler than we are? Could it be as simple (and I'm
> not
> really suggesting these) as "login server" and "login site"?
>
> What does the wider community think? How do LiveJournal users
> refer to this
> concept today?
fwiw; I think RP is fine for the spec.
I don't think we actually need to have a specific name when talking
to users. it is a site that supports OpenID.
-- Dick
More information about the specs
mailing list