Identifier portability: the fundamental issue

Fri Oct 13 20:12:18 UTC 2006

On Oct 13, 2006, at 12:59, Drummond Reed wrote:
> 1) If the RP sends the IdP-specific identifier, the RP must keep  
> state to
> maintain mapping to the portable identifier (bad), and

I agree, but I'm not sure that this is a big issue. Won't a simple  
cookie be sufficient?

Johannes Ernst
NetMesh Inc.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: lid.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 973 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs/attachments/20061013/8df82bdf/attachment-0002.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
  http://netmesh.info/jernst