Consolidated Delegate Proposal
Josh Hoyt
josh at janrain.com
Tue Oct 10 18:46:15 UTC 2006
oops. Forgot footnote:
1. http://openid.net/pipermail/specs/2006-September/000002.html
On 10/10/06, Josh Hoyt <josh at janrain.com> wrote:
> On 10/10/06, Dick Hardt <dick at sxip.com> wrote:
> > I don't think the delegate needs to be moved. Please see
> > http://openid.net/pipermail/specs/2006-October/000310.html
>
> If I understand it correctly, this is identical to my original
> proposal[1]. I added rp_user_id because it prevents the IdP from
> having to do discovery when the RP has already done it. It is also a
> smaller change in the way that things work.
>
> I am happy with either my original proposal (your proposal) or having
> both fields in the request/response.
>
> Josh
>
More information about the specs
mailing list