Consolidated Delegate Proposal

Josh Hoyt josh at janrain.com
Tue Oct 10 18:44:01 UTC 2006


On 10/10/06, Dick Hardt <dick at sxip.com> wrote:
> I don't think the delegate needs to be moved. Please see
>         http://openid.net/pipermail/specs/2006-October/000310.html

If I understand it correctly, this is identical to my original
proposal[1]. I added rp_user_id because it prevents the IdP from
having to do discovery when the RP has already done it. It is also a
smaller change in the way that things work.

I am happy with either my original proposal (your proposal) or having
both fields in the request/response.

Josh



More information about the specs mailing list