[VOTE] Rename openid.nonce to openid.response_nonce

Recordon, David drecordon at verisign.com
Mon Oct 9 21:19:15 UTC 2006


Judging from a lack of responses, I'm guessing people don't really care.
Is this a correct assessment?

I'm +1 to this to add clarity, though also in the "don't really care"
boat at the same time.

--David

-----Original Message-----
From: specs-bounces at openid.net [mailto:specs-bounces at openid.net] On
Behalf Of Recordon, David
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 5:25 PM
To: specs at openid.net
Subject: [VOTE] Rename openid.nonce to openid.response_nonce

Stemming from the proposal to add a request nonce, the idea to rename
the openid.nonce field to openid.response_nonce surfaced.  Is this
something that we should do?

Vote closes Tuesday the 10th at 3:30pm PST.  Votes are +1 (in support of
idea), 0 (abstain), or -1 (disagree).  Traditionally a -1 vote, with
appropriate technical reasoning, will cause the vote as a whole to fail.
In this case, I believe it will be best to make the decision tallying
all votes for and against unless a strong technical argument can be made
for not renaming this parameter.

--David
_______________________________________________
specs mailing list
specs at openid.net
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs




More information about the specs mailing list