Went Through it With Brad

[Pete Rowley]

Johannes Ernst wrote:
> I very much believe in backwards compatibility. I believe I'm saying 
> the same thing that Brad and David were saying in the original message 
> on this thread. This is a classical case of a tradeoff -- and 
> non-computer-interpreted version strings is the side I come down on 
> because I have tried the other and it can get very ugly when machines 
> mis-guess what happened.
>
There doesn't need to be a trade off between user readable and computer 
parseable. Why is this even an issue?


-- 
Pete

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3241 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs/attachments/20061110/5ad62806/attachment-0002.bin>