Making return_to Optional

[Johannes Ernst]

Is there a use case somewhere you can point me to?

On Nov 6, 2006, at 20:03, Recordon, David wrote:

> Yep...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Drummond Reed [mailto:drummond.reed at cordance.net]
> Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 7:54 PM
> To: Recordon, David; specs at openid.net
> Subject: RE: Making return_to Optional
>
> David, in the message below, I assume you meant to say "return_to  
> is NOW
> an optional parameter..." instead of "return_to is NOT an optional
> parameter...". That's the only way I can make sense of it.
> Am I right?
>
> =Drummond
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: specs-bounces at openid.net [mailto:specs-bounces at openid.net] On
> Behalf Of Recordon, David
> Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 11:10 AM
> To: specs at openid.net
> Subject: Making return_to Optional
>
>> From the call last week and the proposal at
> http://openid.net/pipermail/specs/2006-October/000430.html,  
> return_to is
> not an optional parameter in the authentication request.  The idea  
> being
> that a RP not sending it signals the IdP to not redirect the user  
> back;
> rather an extension will be doing something useful.  I've checked in
> this change, though would like it reviewed since I am not completely
> happy with all the wording.
>
> http://openid.net/svn/comp.php?repname=specifications&path=&compare% 
> 5B%5
> D=%2Fauthentication%2F2.0%2Ftrunk%2Fopenid- 
> authentication.xml at 75&compare
> %5B%5D=%2Fauthentication%2F2.0%2Ftrunk%2Fopenid- 
> authentication.xml at 77&ma
> nualorder=1
>
> Thanks,
> --David
> _______________________________________________
> specs mailing list
> specs at openid.net
> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> specs mailing list
> specs at openid.net
> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs