Making return_to Optional

[Recordon, David]

Yep... 

-----Original Message-----
From: Drummond Reed [mailto:drummond.reed at cordance.net] 
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 7:54 PM
To: Recordon, David; specs at openid.net
Subject: RE: Making return_to Optional

David, in the message below, I assume you meant to say "return_to is NOW
an optional parameter..." instead of "return_to is NOT an optional
parameter...". That's the only way I can make sense of it.
Am I right?

=Drummond 

-----Original Message-----
From: specs-bounces at openid.net [mailto:specs-bounces at openid.net] On
Behalf Of Recordon, David
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 11:10 AM
To: specs at openid.net
Subject: Making return_to Optional

>From the call last week and the proposal at
http://openid.net/pipermail/specs/2006-October/000430.html, return_to is
not an optional parameter in the authentication request.  The idea being
that a RP not sending it signals the IdP to not redirect the user back;
rather an extension will be doing something useful.  I've checked in
this change, though would like it reviewed since I am not completely
happy with all the wording.

http://openid.net/svn/comp.php?repname=specifications&path=&compare%5B%5
D=%2Fauthentication%2F2.0%2Ftrunk%2Fopenid-authentication.xml at 75&compare
%5B%5D=%2Fauthentication%2F2.0%2Ftrunk%2Fopenid-authentication.xml at 77&ma
nualorder=1

Thanks,
--David
_______________________________________________
specs mailing list
specs at openid.net
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs