OpenID IPR Policy Draft
Gabe Wachob
gabe.wachob at amsoft.net
Thu Dec 7 18:00:50 UTC 2006
Brett-
We need to get consensus on what the community wants before we
take this to an attorney.. However, I've done these sorts of IPR policies
for standards efforts several times and I can tell you that the process of
working through these IPR policies is slow, painful and expensive. I think
presenting an "already baked" (ie already drafted by lawyers) IPR policy to
this community and asking for a up/down vote is not in keeping with the
spirit of this development process.
-Gabe
_____
From: specs-bounces at openid.net [mailto:specs-bounces at openid.net] On Behalf
Of Brett McDowell
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 6:48 AM
To: Recordon, David
Cc: specs at openid.net; general at openid.net
Subject: Re: OpenID IPR Policy Draft
This is normally lawyer work. I recommend the companies & individuals
invested in OpenID immediately turn this exercise over to your legal counsel
to ensure your interests--and the interests of the community--are protected
appropriately.
Does the new OpenID organization have legal counsel retained (I don't mean
volunteers, but actually hired)? If not, that would be my second
recommendation.
--Brett
On 12/6/06, Recordon, David <drecordon at verisign.com> wrote:
Hey guys,
Been working with Gabe, and others, on starting to draft an IPR Policy
for OpenID specifications. We'd appreciate feedback in terms of if what
is written captures the correct intent of the community? We realize the
language isn't technically as tight as it needs to be, though first want
to make sure it is saying the right thing. It is largely based on the
IPR Policy for Microformats.
http://openid.net/wiki/index.php/IPR_Policy
Thanks,
--David
_______________________________________________
specs mailing list
specs at openid.net
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
--
Brett McDowell +1.413.662.2744
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs/attachments/20061207/eede8d9c/attachment-0002.htm>
More information about the specs
mailing list