<div dir="ltr">Hi Mike,<div>We do not have any open items relating to the RISC spec at this time in the working group. However, I will put this on the agenda for the call on Tuesday, so I will confirm after the call.</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks,</div><div>Atul</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 3:32 PM Mike Jones <<a href="mailto:Michael.Jones@microsoft.com">Michael.Jones@microsoft.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div lang="EN-US" style="overflow-wrap: break-word;">
<div class="gmail-m_-8388379223792127684WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">You don’t need this to become an Implementer’s Draft imminently if you anticipate making more normative changes. But if you think this is a stable point for the time being, it’s fine to do so.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Your call.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> -- Mike<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div style="border-right:none;border-bottom:none;border-left:none;border-top:1pt solid rgb(225,225,225);padding:3pt 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> Atul Tulshibagwale <<a href="mailto:atultulshi@google.com" target="_blank">atultulshi@google.com</a>> <br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, November 12, 2021 3:30 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Mike Jones <<a href="mailto:Michael.Jones@microsoft.com" target="_blank">Michael.Jones@microsoft.com</a>><br>
<b>Cc:</b> Openid-specs-risc <<a href="mailto:openid-specs-risc@lists.openid.net" target="_blank">openid-specs-risc@lists.openid.net</a>><br>
<b>Subject:</b> [EXTERNAL] New review of RISC profile spec<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Hi Mike,<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">We have made minor changes to the RISC profile specification, which was earlier in review (but was not voted on). Since some of these changes are normative, I suppose we need to start a new review process. I would like to request the OpenID
Foundation on behalf of the SSE Working Group to start such a new review process with the following updated drafts:<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<ul type="disc">
<li class="MsoNormal">
<a href="https://bitbucket.org/openid/risc/src/master/openid-risc-profile-specification-1_0.xml" target="_blank">XML</a><u></u><u></u></li><li class="MsoNormal">
<a href="https://bitbucket.org/openid/risc/src/master/openid-risc-profile-specification-1_0.txt" target="_blank">TXT</a><u></u><u></u></li><li class="MsoNormal">
<a href="https://bitbucket.org/openid/risc/src/master/openid-risc-profile-specification-1_0.html" target="_blank">HTML</a><u></u><u></u></li></ul>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">A summary of the changes made since the last review period is here:<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<ul type="disc">
<li class="MsoNormal">
Added event timestamp to credential-compromised. <u></u><u></u></li><li class="MsoNormal">
Noted that sessions-revoked is now deprecated in favor of the similar CAEP event.<u></u><u></u></li></ul>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thanks,<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Atul<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote></div>