[Openid-specs-risc] openid/sharedsignals: Comment created on issue 248

[github at oidf.org]

openid/sharedsignals event

Issue Comment created on issue 248
Issue Title: Update error table
https://github.com/openid/sharedsignals/pull/248

Comment: > @appsdesh The text says that the Transmitter MAY send the 400 code if the delivery method is not available. But the intro to the table says "Errors are signaled" which should be understood more like a MUST. Adding the delivery unavailability to the table would break backwards compatibility. > > The solution might be to go through the spec and reword the error tables so that they say MAY in the intro. But that seems contentious enough to push off until after v1. We are creating two sources of truth for the error codes, one in the table and another buried in the description. I understand MAY vs MUST, but we are likely making it difficult for the implementers to see a list of all expected/suggested errors. We should align on this holistically for v1 and not punt it.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-risc/attachments/20250425/a8b6ca84/attachment.htm>