[Openid-specs-risc] openid/sharedsignals: Comment created on issue 224

[github at oidf.org]

openid/sharedsignals event

Issue Comment created on issue 224
Issue Title: `events_supported` field added to .well-known/ssf-configuration response
https://github.com/openid/sharedsignals/issues/224

Comment: @vivshankar yes, I saw it had not moved much, so I thought it would be best to address it directly, and generate a pull request with the suggested change to have firm ground to start the debate on. I think it is generally accepted that we need "something" but I can understand if we ant to debate about OPTIONAL vs RECOMMENDED for the field, or if a discovery endpoint is complex enough to warrant its own endpoint definition. (e.g. /.well-known/ssf-events-supported as REQUIRED) etc... Pull Request: https://github.com/openid/sharedsignals/pull/225
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-risc/attachments/20250123/a914995b/attachment.htm>