[Openid-specs-risc] Kicking off the OpenID CAEP / Shared Signals interop event at Gartner London

[Tom Sato]

Atul

This is great!!

I am still getting a lot of attention to my LinkedIn post regarding the Dec
10th OpenID blog post on SSF Interop at Gartner.
I think more people will participate in our InterOp.

1. Can someone write up a blog post or report on the result of the last
InterOp because those that did not attend, including myself, would love to
understand how things went.
2. Regarding the Conformance Test, it would be good to know the proposed
spec so that we can prepare in advance.
3. New Participants: I can market this to most of Asia, including Japan.
4. Events. Not all events in CEAP, RISC, SCIM protocols are supported by
individual implementers so, it would help the interop, if we put together a
matrix of events supported by each implementor.

I am thinking of doing a webinar type of event for Japan and APAC.
This event will be about SSF implementation for developers.
Anyone interested in speaking, please let me know.

Tom Sato
tomsatomail at gmail.com



On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 7:09 AM Atul Tulshibagwale via Openid-specs-risc <
openid-specs-risc at lists.openid.net> wrote:

> Hi all,
> As some of you may know, Gartner has decided to (again) host an
> interoperability event to demonstrate real-world implementations of CAEP
> and Shared Signals. We have now had two such events, and it's just awesome
> to be invited back.
>
> However, we should raise the bar and demonstrate our progress on the
> standard in conjunction with the event in order to keep the interest from
> the audience. This will also help us get closer to the goals of the SSWG.
> Here are a few thoughts of how we can do this:
>
>    - *Conformance testing*: Thomas Darimont is working on conformance
>    tests, so we should explore if we can have all implementations do
>    conformance testing before they can participate. We can be flexible about
>    which features from among the conformance test suite we require
>    participants to pass.
>    - *Production implementation*: It'll be great for implementers to be
>    able to demonstrate production implementations, but if all are not in
>    production, at least indicate in the results whether the implementation is
>    in production or not. This will build confidence among the audience that
>    this is something they can use right away.
>    - *New Participants*: We can be more flexible in order to help new
>    implementers participate in the interop, so the rules could be different if
>    you have already participated versus if you are a first time participant.
>    This will help more implementers participate and expand the breadth of
>    products / services / implementations that support Shared Signals.
>    - *SCIM Events*: In past interoperability events, we've focused almost
>    exclusively on CAEP events. I'd love to explore if some of us are
>    interested in implementing SCIM Events or RISC events too.
>
> In order to get started, I feel we should do the following:
>
>    - Do a retrospective of the recently concluded interop
>    - Discuss the parameters of the new interoperability event
>
> Is Tuesday 8 AM PT next week (1/21) a good time for everyone interested to
> talk about this?
>
> Regardless of the call, please share your thoughts on this mailing list.
>
> Thanks,
> Atul
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openid-specs-risc mailing list
> Openid-specs-risc at lists.openid.net
> https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-risc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-risc/attachments/20250115/e1c400fd/attachment.htm>