[Openid-specs-risc] openid/sharedsignals: Comment created on issue 201

[github at oidf.org]

openid/sharedsignals event

Issue Comment created on issue 201
Issue Title: A list of IPs as a new subject member in SSF
https://github.com/openid/sharedsignals/issues/201

Comment: We have added two Simple Subject formats in the Shared Signals spec already: [jwt_id](https://openid.github.io/sharedsignals/openid-sharedsignals-framework-1_0.html#name-jwt-id-subject-identifier-f) and [saml_assertion_id](https://openid.github.io/sharedsignals/openid-sharedsignals-framework-1_0.html#name-saml-assertion-id-subject-i). So this would simply be a third one. The `opaque` format doesn't work quite like you are suggesting above. It takes two fields, `format` and `id`: ``` { "format": "opaque", "id": } ``` not `format` and `ips`: ``` { "format": "opaque", "ips": }
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-risc/attachments/20240914/24a33dd1/attachment.html>