[Openid-specs-risc] openid/sharedsignals: Comment created on issue 158

[github at oidf.org]

openid/sharedsignals event

Issue Comment created on issue 158
Issue Title: Explore machine reachable approach to event definitions
https://github.com/openid/sharedsignals/issues/158

Comment: I feel strongly that we should _not_ include the entire SET in the definition. Just the event itself. Since the `events` claim of the SET is a dictionary mapping these URNs to objects, it will be easier to model if we have schemas for each individual object. Also, if the schema included the full SET, then any changes to the SET structure (like the proposed inclusion of `txn`) would force us to update all of the event schemas.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-risc/attachments/20240429/c91c8e08/attachment.html>