[Openid-specs-risc] Call notes

[Atul Tulshibagwale]

Hi all,
Here are the notes from today's call. They are also stored [here
<https://hackmd.io/@oidf-wg-sse/wg-meeting-20221115>].

WG Meeting: 2022-11-15
<https://hackmd.io/yQRXiqjsS-G7nA6FRqJvYw?both#Agenda>Agenda

   - [Shayne] Discuss Phil Hunt’s request for sub_id instead of a per-SET
   subject
   - [Atul] Stream ID pull request
   - [Atul] Name change update?

<https://hackmd.io/yQRXiqjsS-G7nA6FRqJvYw?both#Attendees>Attendees

   - Atul Tulshibagwale (SGNL)
   - Topher Marie (Strata)
   - Shayne Miel (Cisco)
   - Greg Brown (Axiad)
   - Stan Bounev (VeriClouds)
   - Asad Ali (Thales)
   - Edmund Jay ()

<https://hackmd.io/yQRXiqjsS-G7nA6FRqJvYw?both#Notes>Notes
<https://hackmd.io/yQRXiqjsS-G7nA6FRqJvYw?both#Discuss-Phil-Hunt%E2%80%99s-request-for-%E2%80%9Csub%E2%80%9D-instead-of-a-per-SET-%E2%80%9Csubject%E2%80%9D>Discuss
Phil Hunt’s request for “sub” instead of a per-SET “subject”

   - Currently the SSE spec inserts a subject in each “event” claim
   - All of the events in a SET should be about the same subject
   - Interop is really hard because “sub” is commonly used
   - What is the history here?
   - Q: Is our complex subject format compatible with how “sub” is used /
   specified by JWTs?
   - Q: Does the spec allow for multiple events to be sent in the same SET?
   -

<https://hackmd.io/yQRXiqjsS-G7nA6FRqJvYw?both#Stream-ID-pull-request>Stream
ID pull request

   - Please review the “stream Id” pull request
   <https://github.com/openid/sse/pull/9>
   - Q: Is “stream id” a part of the RISC spec? A: It is a part of the SSF
   spec <https://openid.net/specs/openid-sse-framework-1_0-ID1.html> that
   the RISC spec depends upon

<https://hackmd.io/yQRXiqjsS-G7nA6FRqJvYw?both#Name-Change-Update>Name
Change Update

   - The new name of the working group is “Shared Signals Framework” (SSF)
   - We should change the name in the specifications after the “stream id”
   pull request is merged in

<https://hackmd.io/yQRXiqjsS-G7nA6FRqJvYw?both#Action-Items>Action Items

   - Shayne to investigate whether the JWT “sub” claim is compatible with
   the compound / complex subject format used in SSF
   - Atul to investigate whether multiple events are permitted in the same
   SSF SET, and if not clarify that in the spec
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-risc/attachments/20221115/e715a376/attachment-0001.html>