[Openid-specs-risc] WG Call Notes
Atul Tulshibagwale
atul at sgnl.ai
Tue Nov 1 17:49:09 UTC 2022
Hi all,
Here are the meeting notes of the call on 11/1/2022. They are also
available here <https://hackmd.io/@oidf-wg-sse/wg-meeting-20221101>.
WG Meeting: 2022-11-01
<https://hackmd.io/@oidf-wg-sse/wg-meeting-20221101#Agenda>Agenda
- Introductions / Re-introductions
- Pull Requests
- Stream ID Discussion
- Update on MITRE Round Table
- IETF Subject Identifiers in Last Call for Review
- Activity Events
<https://hackmd.io/@oidf-wg-sse/wg-meeting-20221101#Attendees>Attendees
- Atul Tulshibagwale (SGNL)
- James Fisher (Easy Dynamics)
- Frank Taylor (VMWare)
- Srinivas Challa (Workday)
- Edmund Jay ()
- Nancy Cam Winget (Cisco)
<https://hackmd.io/@oidf-wg-sse/wg-meeting-20221101#Notes>Notes
<https://hackmd.io/@oidf-wg-sse/wg-meeting-20221101#lt-Agenda-item-1-gt><
Agenda item 1 >
-
<https://hackmd.io/@oidf-wg-sse/wg-meeting-20221101#Action-Items>Action
Items
- Streams Pull Request <https://github.com/openid/sse/pull/9> (Shayne)
- Merged the namespace pull request (Atul)
<https://hackmd.io/@oidf-wg-sse/wg-meeting-20221101#Multiple-Streams>Multiple
Streams
- It’s not only about event types
- There needs to be a 1:1 mapping between Tx and Rx
- You may want to route streams differently based on country of origin
of subjects
- Staging versus production streams may be different
- If you are updating versions, you may want to have some streams
relaying events from the new version
<https://hackmd.io/@oidf-wg-sse/wg-meeting-20221101#IETF-SecEvents-Subject-Identifiers>IETF
SecEvents Subject Identifiers
- Subject Idetifiers
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-secevent-subject-identifiers/>
<https://hackmd.io/@oidf-wg-sse/wg-meeting-20221101#WG-Name-Chagne>WG Name
Chagne
- No comments received that we know of
- If Tim confirms, we can change the name of the working group to
“Shared Signals Framework” (SSF)
<https://hackmd.io/@oidf-wg-sse/wg-meeting-20221101#Activity-Events>Activity
Events
- Workday would like to see events about user activity in the session
- The use-case is continuous authentication, to see if the user is
performing any anomalous activity
- The IETF working group is considering use SCIM operations with SSE
- Current proposal in IETF - SCIM Events
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-scim-events/>
- Would “assurance level change work?” Probably not because the
application may not know what the assurance level is
- User may be coming from a strange IP address range
- There may be a separate service that tracks user activity and provides
events based on activity
- “user ran x report” could be an event
- “user accessed PII data” could be a more generally understood event,
which can be sent.
- Atul and Srinivas to sync up offline about this
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-risc/attachments/20221101/58efb683/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Openid-specs-risc
mailing list