[Openid-specs-risc] Fwd: CAEP Weekly Sync - Does this mean that closed loop verif...
Shayne Miel (smiel)
smiel at cisco.com
Tue Nov 9 17:01:49 UTC 2021
If I recall correctly, we weren't able to come up with a convincing reason to change the way verification worked. But we also recognized that whoever suggested the change (Tim, I think) wasn't at the meeting and we might be missing some context from them. Maybe worth another discussion today if Tim is going to be there?
- Shayne
________________________________
From: Openid-specs-risc <openid-specs-risc-bounces at lists.openid.net> on behalf of Atul Tulshibagwale via Openid-specs-risc <openid-specs-risc at lists.openid.net>
Sent: Monday, November 8, 2021 12:03 PM
To: Openid-specs-risc <openid-specs-risc at lists.openid.net>
Subject: [Openid-specs-risc] Fwd: CAEP Weekly Sync - Does this mean that closed loop verif...
Hi all,
Tim has a question about the notes from the last bi-weekly call. Does anyone have more context on this?
Thanks,
Atul
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Tim Cappalli (Google Docs) <comments-noreply at docs.google.com<mailto:comments-noreply at docs.google.com>>
Date: Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 7:47 AM
Subject: CAEP Weekly Sync - Does this mean that closed loop verif...
To: <atultulshi at google.com<mailto:atultulshi at google.com>>
Tim Cappalli added a comment to the following document
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZFwJJDwwSBNKX35VObClC1ctMbMMuHJtr5qY-7xsLW8/edit?disco=AAAARfca5dE&ts=6189468b&usp=comment_email_document&usp_dm=false>
[https://ssl.gstatic.com/docs/doclist/images/mediatype/icon_1_document_x64.png]CAEP Weekly Sync
Closed loop verification: A receiver using SET Push provides a 200 OK or 202 Accepted response so that the Transmitter knows the event has been delivered. In SET Poll, a similar acknowledgement is achieved by the Receiver specifying the Ids of the events it has received.
[https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/a-/AOh14GgyWUdFP9EJZIvHzv_kj_yyQD23D4uYwApZyZq1=s50-c-k-no]
Tim Cappalli
New
Does this mean that closed loop verification using a token is not desired?
Open<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZFwJJDwwSBNKX35VObClC1ctMbMMuHJtr5qY-7xsLW8/edit?disco=AAAARfca5dE&usp=comment_email_discussion&usp_dm=false&ts=6189468b>
Google LLC, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA
You have received this email because you are subscribed to all discussions on CAEP Weekly Sync<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZFwJJDwwSBNKX35VObClC1ctMbMMuHJtr5qY-7xsLW8/edit?disco=AAAARfca5dE&ts=6189468b&usp=comment_email_document&usp_dm=false>. Change what Google Docs sends you.<https://docs.google.com/document/u/118106140405441444752/docos/notify?ouid=118106140405441444752&id=1ZFwJJDwwSBNKX35VObClC1ctMbMMuHJtr5qY-7xsLW8&title=CAEP+Weekly+Sync&resourcekey> You can reply to this email to reply to the discussion.
[https://www.gstatic.com/images/branding/googlelogo/2x/googlelogo_tm_black54_color_96x40dp.png]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-risc/attachments/20211109/e3a175c0/attachment.html>
More information about the Openid-specs-risc
mailing list