[Openid-specs-risc] Questions from todays call

[Atul Tulshibagwale]

Thanks Tim,

Hi Nancy,
Tim and I discussed these questions earlier today. We can discuss more on
the call next week if you have any questions.

Atul

On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 1:21 PM Tim Cappalli via Openid-specs-risc <
openid-specs-risc at lists.openid.net> wrote:

> Hi Nancy,
>
> *What is the correct format for the "delivery" section when updating a
> stream's configuration?*
> The normative definition in section 11 is the correct format. We will
> update the non-normative example in section 7.
>
>
> https://bitbucket.org/openid/risc/issues/21/example-incorrect-for-delivery-object-in
>
>
> *When exactly are Event Streams created or deleted?*
> We'd like to discuss this one further on the call next week if possible.
>
> *Why does Add Subject return a 200, but Remove Subject return a 204?*
> The thinking here was that the transmitter may want to return additional
> details such as an alternative subject identifier. If no additional details
> need to be provided, a 204 should be used. We will add additional text to
> explain that.
>
> *Should Add Subject and Remove Subject also return 404 if the stream
> doesn’t exist?*
> We believe it should be a 400 since the request is about a subject, not a
> stream (or its status).
>
> *Why is there no 404 for Triggering a Verification Event?*
> Would like to discuss this one live as well.
>
> *How should we specify the user format for Complex or Aliases subject
> formats when describing a stream's configuration?*
> We'd like to discuss whether the subject should even be present in the
> stream's configuration object. We had previously discussed potentially
> removing it due to the complexity it can present, especially when different
> subject formats are used for different events.
>
> *There appears to be a typo in the section on updating a stream's status.*
> We will tweak that text to read a bit better.
> openid / RISC / issues / #24 - SSE 7.1.1.2 response description is unclear
> — Bitbucket
> <https://bitbucket.org/openid/risc/issues/24/sse-7112-response-description-is-unclear>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Openid-specs-risc <openid-specs-risc-bounces at lists.openid.net> on
> behalf of Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing) via Openid-specs-risc <
> openid-specs-risc at lists.openid.net>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 28, 2021 13:33
> *To:* openid-specs-risc at lists.openid.net <
> openid-specs-risc at lists.openid.net>
> *Subject:* [Openid-specs-risc] Questions from todays call
>
>
> Thanks Tim for helping, looking forward to getting feedback and
> clarification to the attached questions.
>
>
>
> Best, Nancy (Shayne and Josh)
> _______________________________________________
> Openid-specs-risc mailing list
> Openid-specs-risc at lists.openid.net
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-risc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-risc/attachments/20211004/cded3bab/attachment.html>