[Openid-specs-risc] Questions from todays call

Tim Cappalli Tim.Cappalli at microsoft.com
Mon Oct 4 20:21:43 UTC 2021


Hi Nancy,

What is the correct format for the "delivery" section when updating a stream's configuration?
The normative definition in section 11 is the correct format. We will update the non-normative example in section 7.

https://bitbucket.org/openid/risc/issues/21/example-incorrect-for-delivery-object-in


When exactly are Event Streams created or deleted?
We'd like to discuss this one further on the call next week if possible.

Why does Add Subject return a 200, but Remove Subject return a 204?
The thinking here was that the transmitter may want to return additional details such as an alternative subject identifier. If no additional details need to be provided, a 204 should be used. We will add additional text to explain that.

Should Add Subject and Remove Subject also return 404 if the stream doesn’t exist?
We believe it should be a 400 since the request is about a subject, not a stream (or its status).

Why is there no 404 for Triggering a Verification Event?
Would like to discuss this one live as well.

How should we specify the user format for Complex or Aliases subject formats when describing a stream's configuration?
We'd like to discuss whether the subject should even be present in the stream's configuration object. We had previously discussed potentially removing it due to the complexity it can present, especially when different subject formats are used for different events.

There appears to be a typo in the section on updating a stream's status.
We will tweak that text to read a bit better.
openid / RISC / issues / #24 - SSE 7.1.1.2 response description is unclear — Bitbucket<https://bitbucket.org/openid/risc/issues/24/sse-7112-response-description-is-unclear>



________________________________
From: Openid-specs-risc <openid-specs-risc-bounces at lists.openid.net> on behalf of Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing) via Openid-specs-risc <openid-specs-risc at lists.openid.net>
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 13:33
To: openid-specs-risc at lists.openid.net <openid-specs-risc at lists.openid.net>
Subject: [Openid-specs-risc] Questions from todays call


Thanks Tim for helping, looking forward to getting feedback and clarification to the attached questions.



Best, Nancy (Shayne and Josh)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-risc/attachments/20211004/c50842de/attachment.html>


More information about the Openid-specs-risc mailing list