[Openid-specs-risc] Notes from today's call

[Atul Tulshibagwale]

I've updated the pull request to incorporate the changes we discussed
today:
https://bitbucket.org/openid/risc/pull-requests/9

Please review and provide your feedback.
Thanks,
Atul

On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 11:30 AM Tim Cappalli <Tim.Cappalli at microsoft.com>
wrote:

> +1 to "Continuous Access Evaluation Profile"
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Openid-specs-risc <openid-specs-risc-bounces at lists.openid.net> on
> behalf of Atul Tulshibagwale via Openid-specs-risc <
> openid-specs-risc at lists.openid.net>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 20, 2021 13:58
> *To:* Openid-specs-risc <openid-specs-risc at lists.openid.net>
> *Subject:* [Openid-specs-risc] Notes from today's call
>
> Hi all,
> Here are the notes from today's meeting. They are also available in this
> document
> <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.google.com%2Fdocument%2Fd%2F1ZFwJJDwwSBNKX35VObClC1ctMbMMuHJtr5qY-7xsLW8%2Fedit%3Fusp%3Dsharing&data=04%7C01%7Ctim.cappalli%40microsoft.com%7C4ca8e440d7ae4080fe6608d904260638%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637545383644601451%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=4phy2Fux8mL2A2bCx0nUf1eWDHc0glDhHLXzK2JqNoc%3D&reserved=0>
> .
>
> Call on 4/20/2021
>
> Attendees:
>
>    -
>
>    Atul Tulshibagwale (Google)
>    -
>
>    Matt Domsch (SailPoint)
>    -
>
>    Martin Gallo (SecureAuth)
>    -
>
>    Jeffrey Broberg (SecureAuth)
>    -
>
>    Asad Ali (Thales)
>    -
>
>    Stan Bounev (VeriClouds)
>
>
> Agenda:
>
>    1.
>
>    Naming issue
>    2.
>
>    RISC - CAEP reconciliation
>    3.
>
>    OIDF Workshop
>    4.
>
>    Resync request
>
>
> Notes:
>
>    -
>
>    Naming proposal: “SSE Profile of SETs” is not appropriate anymore
>    because it defines not just a profile of SETs, but also the event
>    management API and the delivery mechanisms. An appropriate name for the SSE
>    Profile spec could be “Shared Signals Framework”
>    -
>
>    The CAEP Event Types specification could be renamed to the “Continuous
>    Access Events Profile” or “Continuous Access Evaluation Profile” of the
>    Shared Signaling Framework. This retains the acronym CAEP
>    -
>
>    Martin (SecureAuth): Evaluation does not seem to be a part of the
>    specification. We should clarify in the specification that evaluation
>    decisions are not prescribed by the specification
>    -
>
>    “Continuous Access Evaluation Profile” is more appropriate because the
>    events are related to access evaluation, not just about access
>    -
>
>    Atul to update the Pull Request to include the clarification about
>    evaluation decisions.
>    -
>
>    Defer the “RISC-CAEP reconciliation” topic for when Annabelle is
>    present
>    -
>
>    Resync request:
>    -
>
>       Should be a “rewind request” where all events requested by Receiver
>       are replayed (not selectively)
>       -
>
>       Transmitter may determine the time period for which the events are
>       available
>       -
>
>    We should merge the present drafts without the “rewind request” into
>    the master, and then take this up as a follow on item
>    -
>
>    OIDF presentation - Atul to incorporate inputs from Asad and Matt and
>    share presentation draft to the list
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Atul Tulshibagwale
>
> Software Engineer,
>
> Google Workspace
>
> atultulshi at google.com
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-risc/attachments/20210420/c9cc2ace/attachment.html>