[Openid-specs-risc] [EXTERNAL] Re: SSE profile spec approach

[Atul Tulshibagwale]

Thanks Mike, for your guidance.

As recommended by Mike, I have done the following (on the caep-draft-01
<https://bitbucket.org/openid/risc/src/caep-draft-01/> branch):

   1. Merged the file that we were working on "openid-sse-profile-2_0.xml"
   into the original file "openid-risc-profile-1_0.xml"
   2. Removed the separately created "openid-sse-profile-2_0.xml" file.
   3. Renamed the "openid-risc-profile-1_0.xml" to
   "openid-sse-profile-2_0.xml". This new file now retains all the changes to
   the earlier RISC profile, and therefore does not lose the git history.
   4. Retained previous authors (assuming they are OK with the changes
   being made).

Hopefully this resolves the issue of being able to easily see the changes
from the previous draft, while preserving the work in the working group
over the past several months.

The following changes need to be done before merging to the HEAD branch:

   1. Remove the IANA section and reword other sections appropriately.
   2. Agree on the versioning and how we can refer to the RISC profile that
   some have implemented.
   3. Other issues that may come up.

Atul

On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 4:34 PM Mike Jones <Michael.Jones at microsoft.com>
wrote:

> To the extent that the new document is an update to the existing RISC
> specification, it would be much cleaner to update the existing doc rather
> than creating a parallel specification that duplicates some of the
> content.  It would be good to merge the proposed changes into the existing
> doc.
>
>
>
>                            -- Mike (writing as OpenID Foundation Secretary)
>
>
>
> *From:* Openid-specs-risc <openid-specs-risc-bounces at lists.openid.net> *On
> Behalf Of *Atul Tulshibagwale via Openid-specs-risc
> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 8, 2020 11:06 AM
> *To:* Openid-specs-risc <openid-specs-risc at lists.openid.net>
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [Openid-specs-risc] SSE profile spec approach
>
>
>
> Missed the notes link:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZFwJJDwwSBNKX35VObClC1ctMbMMuHJtr5qY-7xsLW8/edit?usp=sharing
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 11:05 AM Atul Tulshibagwale <atultulshi at google.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> An update from the WG call today (notes here):
>
>
>
> While we all agree that the present SSE profile draft represents a
> revision of the RISC profile draft, we are unable to reach consensus on
> whether we can use the document named "openid-sse-profile-2_0.xml
> <https://bitbucket.org/openid/risc/src/caep-draft-01/openid-sse-profile-2_0.xml>"
> in the caep-draft-01
> <https://bitbucket.org/openid/risc/branch/caep-draft-01> branch as the
> basis for future commentary and updates, or whether we should create pull
> requests on the file named "openid-risc-profile-1_0.xml
> <https://bitbucket.org/openid/risc/src/master/openid-risc-profile-1_0.xml>"
> in the main branch, review the pull requests, and then use the resultant
> draft for future commentary and updates.
>
>
>
> We agreed in the call that we should ask the OpenID Foundation committee
> to opine on the way forward.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Atul
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Atul Tulshibagwale*
>
> Software Engineer,
>
> Google Workspace
>
> atultulshi at google.com
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-risc/attachments/20201210/c96c8bdf/attachment.html>