[Openid-specs-risc] Subject identifiers / categories call
Atul Tulshibagwale
atultulshi at google.com
Wed Aug 26 01:09:34 UTC 2020
Hi all,
We had the call earlier today to discuss multiple subject identifiers and
subject categories in subject identifiers. Annabelle wasn't able to attend.
The following is a (incomplete) summary of the discussion:
1. We agreed that the subject processing can be greatly simplified if
when we specify multiple subjects in a single event, we always interpret
that to mean that the intended subject of the event is an "AND" of all
subject identifiers.
2. An interesting proposal from Praveen (Microsoft) was that we could
have a different subject-type that had fields like "user" and "device".
Upon discussion we figured out each one of these fields would require the
same subject-identifier structure, so it won't be any different from the
multiple subject-identifiers proposal being considered right now. It'll be
great if Praveen can share his example to this list anyway, for further
discussion.
3. We agreed that defining event-specific subject identifier
combinations would not be good for implementers.
4. subject-categories are required to disambiguate use-cases where a
subject identified by a subject-type of say, phone-number or iss-sub need
to be classified as either a device or a user.
I've added the notes to the weekly sync doc
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZFwJJDwwSBNKX35VObClC1ctMbMMuHJtr5qY-7xsLW8/edit?usp=sharing>,
but since I was actively participating in the discussion, the notes are
(very) incomplete.
Atul
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-risc/attachments/20200825/752a98d0/attachment.html>
More information about the Openid-specs-risc
mailing list