[Openid-specs-risc] Feedback on the draft spec

[Stan Bounev]

Hi all,

I had some issues with the permissions to Bitbucket and was not able to add the ‘compromised’ use case to the RISC spec. I just asked Marius if he could do it before the meeting at 10am.

In case he is not able to, I’ve attached the use case to this email.

I will be available during the meeting and after that to address questions about the use case.

Thanks,
Stan



From: Openid-specs-risc <openid-specs-risc-bounces at lists.openid.net> on behalf of Atul Tulshibagwale via Openid-specs-risc <openid-specs-risc at lists.openid.net>
Reply-To: Atul Tulshibagwale <atultulshi at google.com>
Date: Tuesday, May 26, 2020 at 6:45 AM
To: Openid-specs-risc <openid-specs-risc at lists.openid.net>
Subject: [Openid-specs-risc] Feedback on the draft spec

Hi all,
Seeing some excellent feedback on the draft spec in the Google Doc below. Thanks to all those who have reviewed it.

For those who haven't seen it yet: If possible, please review the spec and add your feedback / comments before the call today, so that we can focus more on the feedback rather than introducing the changes in the call.

[Image removed by sender.] openid-sse-profile-draft<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EShCGEAI_m3Syu5ZF-zcK-dAxEh4p_HrVNQA4kjKtOM/edit?usp=drive_web>

Thanks,
Atul
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-risc/attachments/20200526/4175ed94/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 3.9 Compromised credential
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 501 bytes
Desc: 3.9 Compromised credential
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-risc/attachments/20200526/4175ed94/attachment.obj>