[openid-specs-rande] SAML to OIDC mapping specification

[Marcus Hardt]

On 10. Mar 2021 18:26, Etienne Dysli Metref wrote:
> On 10.03.21 15:40, Marcus Hardt wrote:
> > And as long as there is no userbase existing that uses attributes
> > different to those suggested by the OIDCRE Whitepaper, I see no reason to
> > even consider moving away from that.
> 
> You seem to have missed what I wrote on 2021-03-08:
> 
> > Our SWITCH edu-ID OIDC OP use the same camelCase claim names as its SAML
> > part.

Indeed. Sorry for that!
 
> and also
> 
> > On 02.03.21 12:28, Marcus Hardt wrote:
> >> Unless there is a very good reason to drop the '_', I don't think
> >> this will happen.
> >
> > My reasoning is that renaming claims while keeping their meaning and
> > values identical to SAML attributes introduces unnecessary complexity.
> > This kind of complexity can confuse deployers. Moreover, it was based
> > on a misunderstanding of the OIDC specification.
> 
> Are you willing to consider this argument?

Any argument counts!
Just: "renaming" is in the eye of the beholder, right?

-- 
Marcus.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-rande/attachments/20210311/cb6c1975/attachment-0001.asc>