[openid-specs-rande] SAML to OIDC mapping specification

[Etienne Dysli Metref]

On 10.03.21 15:40, Marcus Hardt wrote:
> And as long as there is no userbase existing that uses attributes
> different to those suggested by the OIDCRE Whitepaper, I see no reason to
> even consider moving away from that.

You seem to have missed what I wrote on 2021-03-08:

> Our SWITCH edu-ID OIDC OP use the same camelCase claim names as its SAML
> part.

and also

> On 02.03.21 12:28, Marcus Hardt wrote:
>> Unless there is a very good reason to drop the '_', I don't think
>> this will happen.
>
> My reasoning is that renaming claims while keeping their meaning and
> values identical to SAML attributes introduces unnecessary complexity.
> This kind of complexity can confuse deployers. Moreover, it was based
> on a misunderstanding of the OIDC specification.

Are you willing to consider this argument?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 840 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-rande/attachments/20210310/cd5cfc1a/attachment.asc>