[openid-specs-rande] SAML to OIDC mapping specification

[Etienne Dysli Metref]

On 09.03.21 13:07, Ivan Kanakarakis wrote:
> I can understand how it is nicer to have a single set of claims, but ..
> if there is no reason to define one form and not the other,
> and the choice is purely aesthetics or convention,
> then why don't we define both forms as equivalent (aliases)
> and thus support the current behaviour of all systems?

Absolutely! :D This gives every side their favourite naming convention.
The specification may become a bit bloated, but I think this would be a
cheap price to pay for this.

> Some systems will release snake_case, some CamelCase, and some a mix.
> Internally the systems should change to map the form they already
> process (which should be trivial).

I confirm it's trivial to release both with a Shibboleth IdP and its
OIDC extension.

Cheers,
  Etienne

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 840 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-rande/attachments/20210310/3f334f28/attachment.asc>