[openid-specs-rande] SAML to OIDC mapping specification

[Heather Flanagan]

On Mar 3, 2021, 8:05 AM -0800, Etienne Dysli Metref <etienne.dysli-metref at switch.ch>, wrote:
> On 02.03.21 12:28, Marcus Hardt wrote:
> > Same here: We've built our Helmholtz Infrastructure fully on the
> > names suggested by the whitepaper in [2].
> >
> > Unless there is a very good reason to drop the '_', I don't think
> > this will happen.
>
> So what about people who implemented different claim names? With which
> criteria do we decide who has to change? (Assuming everyone wants to
> follow an eventual specification.)
>
>

That’s what makes the standards development process so challenging. We need to consider the different variants, why they were done that way, and do our best to come to consensus on a single direction. No one said it would be easy!

Heather Flanagan — Translator of Geek to Human
https://sphericalcowconsulting.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-rande/attachments/20210303/96bc6aeb/attachment.html>