[Openid-specs-mobile-profile] Issue #70: CIBA grant type inconsistency (openid/mobile)
issues-reply at bitbucket.org
Thu Jul 12 18:27:16 UTC 2018
New issue 70: CIBA grant type inconsistency
The value of extension grant types have to be full URIs by definition from RFC6749 but the CIBA draft intermixes "backchannel_request" and "urn:openid:params:modrna:grant‑type:backchannel_request" for the parameter value of the grant type it defines. The latter is what it should be in the draft anywhere the actual value of the grant type parameter is used. When referring to it in text the underscore probably shouldn't be used in "backchannel_request" so as to avoid potential confusion with an actual parameter value. I.e. something like, "and a new grant type called backchannel request to poll the token endpoint."
More information about the Openid-specs-mobile-profile