<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body dir="auto">
<div>Depends on what u mean adopted. Per the new 53 once nist says it's approved its part of the framework. That said, we won't do that until it passes the oidf vote. <br>
<br>
Sent from my iPhone</div>
<div><br>
On Sep 11, 2017, at 1:04 PM, Peter Alterman <<a href="mailto:palterman@safe-biopharma.org">palterman@safe-biopharma.org</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_default" style="color:rgb(0,0,0)">Perhaps stating the obvious, but the igov protocol doesn't become part of the USG framework until/unless it is formally adopted. <br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="color:rgb(0,0,0)">That step shouldn't be taken for granted or ignored.</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="color:rgb(0,0,0)">regards,</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="color:rgb(0,0,0)">Peter</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all">
<div>
<div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div>
<div>------------------------------------------------------------<br>
</div>
Peter Alterman, Ph.D.<br>
</div>
Chief Operating Officer<br>
SAFE-BioPharma Association<br>
</div>
cell: 1-301-943-7452</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><span style="font-size:x-small;font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(26,26,26)">FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA</span><span style="font-size:x-small;font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(26,26,26)">: </span></div>
<div dir="ltr"><font size="2"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(26,26,26)"><a href="https://twitter.com/SAFE_BioPharma" target="_blank"><span style="color:rgb(16,60,192)">Twitter</span></a></span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(26,26,26)"> </span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(26,26,26)">
</span><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(26,26,26)">& <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/safe-biopharma-association?trk=nav_account_sub_nav_company_admin" target="_blank"><span style="color:rgb(16,60,192)">LinkedIn</span></a></span></font><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
<br>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 12:43 PM, John Bradley via Openid-specs-igov
<span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:openid-specs-igov@lists.openid.net" target="_blank">openid-specs-igov@lists.openid.net</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div style="word-wrap:break-word">I think Phil is referring to the IETF track that VOT is currently on per RFC2026
<div><a href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2026" target="_blank">https://tools.ietf.org/html/<wbr>rfc2026</a></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>VOT did have several BOFs as I recall but for whatever reason couldn’t justify a working group and no other working group was a good fit. The internet society was interested in it and a security AD agreed to sponsor it.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>The guidelines for AD sponsors drafts are <a href="https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/ad-sponsoring-docs.html" target="_blank">https://www.ietf.org/iesg/<wbr>statement/ad-sponsoring-docs.<wbr>html</a></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>The experimental status theoretically impacts the amount of review the IESG will do. In reality they all go through last call and IESG review.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>AD sponsors docs can be standards track.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>If I parse Phill correctly he would like the document to be standards track to provide the appropriate gravitas.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>This is not a group that can make those sorts of decisions but this group can provide feedback to the document shepherd and responsible AD.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>The current track is the fastest to get a RFC though makes as experimental. </div>
<div>Leif and I did discuss the Working group opption at the last IETF in Prague. </div>
<div>Doing that would slow things down perhaps by a year or more.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I suppose the middle road would be to get out an experimental one, and then take that to a WG for refinement on the standards track.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>In Any event I get the feeling that Oracle would like more input.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>John B.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>On Sep 11, 2017, at 12:00 PM, Grassi, Paul A. (Fed) <<a href="mailto:paul.grassi@nist.gov" target="_blank">paul.grassi@nist.gov</a>> wrote:</div>
<br class="m_2450306431764467082Apple-interchange-newline">
<div>
<div class="m_2450306431764467082WordSection1" style="font-family:Helvetica;font-size:12px;font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)">
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
iGov, among many goals, will serve as a single interop baseline for cross-border federation. It can do that without VOT. What it can’t do, is carry an interoperable assertion of assurance in it’s payload WITHOUT VOT. So, since iGov is not experimental, and
needs VOT, I assert that VOT has graduated from experimental.<u></u><u></u></div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
<u></u> <u></u></div>
<div style="border-style:solid none none;border-top-width:1pt;border-top-color:rgb(181,196,223);padding:3pt 0in 0in">
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
<b><span style="font-size:12pt">From:<span class="m_2450306431764467082Apple-converted-space"> </span></span></b><span style="font-size:12pt">Openid-specs-igov <<a href="mailto:openid-specs-igov-bounces@lists.openid.net" target="_blank">openid-specs-igov-bounces@<wbr>lists.openid.net</a>>
on behalf of "Phil Hunt (IDM) via Openid-specs-igov" <<a href="mailto:openid-specs-igov@lists.openid.net" target="_blank">openid-specs-igov@lists.<wbr>openid.net</a>><br>
<b>Reply-To:<span class="m_2450306431764467082Apple-converted-space"> </span></b>"Phil Hunt (IDM)" <<a href="mailto:phil.hunt@oracle.com" target="_blank">phil.hunt@oracle.com</a>><br>
<b>Date:<span class="m_2450306431764467082Apple-converted-space"> </span></b>Monday, September 11, 2017 at 11:07 AM<br>
<b>To:<span class="m_2450306431764467082Apple-converted-space"> </span></b>John Bradley <<a href="mailto:ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com" target="_blank">ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com</a>><br>
<b>Cc:<span class="m_2450306431764467082Apple-converted-space"> </span></b>"<a href="mailto:openid-specs-igov@lists.openid.net" target="_blank">openid-specs-igov@lists.<wbr>openid.net</a>" <<a href="mailto:openid-specs-igov@lists.openid.net" target="_blank">openid-specs-igov@lists.<wbr>openid.net</a>><br>
<b>Subject:<span class="m_2450306431764467082Apple-converted-space"> </span></b>Re: [Openid-specs-igov] Fwd: Regarding the vote on Implementer’s Drafts of Two iGov Specifications<u></u><u></u></span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
<u></u> <u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
The VoT spec is also experimental.<u></u><u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
<u></u> <u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
Having a normative dependence on an experimental spec creates instability and devalues this spec. Or is the intent that igov be experimental?<u></u><u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
<br>
Phil<u></u><u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 12pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
<br>
</p>
On Sep 11, 2017, at 4:48 AM, John Bradley via Openid-specs-igov <<a href="mailto:openid-specs-igov@lists.openid.net" style="color:purple;text-decoration:underline" target="_blank">openid-specs-igov@lists.<wbr>openid.net</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u>
<p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5pt;margin-bottom:5pt" type="cite">
<div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
Forwarding a comment on the vote. <span class="m_2450306431764467082Apple-converted-space"> </span><u></u><u></u></div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
<u></u> <u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
It is not uncommon for OIDF implimentors drafts to have dependencies on ID. As it is not uncommon for IETF WG specs to reference other drafts. <u></u><u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
<u></u> <u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
Strictly speaking vot is a AD sponsors draft so not the same status as a Individual Draft. Yes the IETF has mysterious ways. <u></u><u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
<u></u> <u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
To discuss the IETF process and that document the SAG list is best.<u></u><u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
<u></u> <u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
The iGov WG has had extensive conversations with NIST and the UK and included VOT at there request. NIST is working on a profile of VOT.<u></u><u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
<u></u> <u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
People interested in the iGov discussion with NIST should join the WG. <u></u><u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
<u></u> <u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
As document Sheppard I have been talking to NIST and others about there ability to profile VOT. Getting feedback on that is one of the reasons vot has not been progressed to the IESG yet. That will however happening soon, unless more feedback is received
in the IETF process. <u></u><u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
<u></u> <u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
Honestly the more feedback the better. Sometimes it takes specs referencing important work like VOT before people become aware of them. <u></u><u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
<u></u> <u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
I don't think we have a issue with the iGov implimentors draft, but others can differ.<u></u><u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
<u></u> <u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
Regards <u></u><u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
John B. <u></u><u></u></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
---------- Forwarded message ----------<br>
From: "Prateek Mishra" <<a href="mailto:Prateek.Mishra@oracle.com" style="color:purple;text-decoration:underline" target="_blank">Prateek.Mishra@oracle.com</a>><br>
Date: Sep 11, 2017 00:44<br>
Subject: Fwd: Regarding the vote on Implementer’s Drafts of Two iGov Specifications<br>
To: "John Bradley" <<a href="mailto:ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com" style="color:purple;text-decoration:underline" target="_blank">ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com</a>>, "Phil Hunt (IDM)" <<a href="mailto:phil.hunt@oracle.com" style="color:purple;text-decoration:underline" target="_blank">phil.hunt@oracle.com</a>><br>
Cc:<span class="m_2450306431764467082Apple-converted-space"> </span><br>
<br>
<u></u><u></u></div>
<blockquote style="border-style:none none none solid;border-left-width:1pt;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding:0in 0in 0in 6pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in" type="cite">
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
<u></u> <u></u></div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
<br>
<br>
<u></u><u></u></div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5pt;margin-bottom:5pt" type="cite">
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
Begin forwarded message:<u></u><u></u></div>
</div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
<u></u> <u></u></div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
<b><span style="font-family:'Helvetica Neue',sans-serif">From:<span class="m_2450306431764467082Apple-converted-space"> </span></span></b><span style="font-family:'Helvetica Neue',sans-serif">Prateek Mishra <<a href="mailto:Prateek.Mishra@oracle.com" style="color:purple;text-decoration:underline" target="_blank">Prateek.Mishra@oracle.com</a>></span><u></u><u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
<b><span style="font-family:'Helvetica Neue',sans-serif">Subject: Regarding the vote on Implementer’s Drafts of Two iGov Specifications</span></b><u></u><u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
<b><span style="font-family:'Helvetica Neue',sans-serif">Date:<span class="m_2450306431764467082Apple-converted-space"> </span></span></b><span style="font-family:'Helvetica Neue',sans-serif">September 10, 2017 at 10:42:35 PM PDT</span><u></u><u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
<b><span style="font-family:'Helvetica Neue',sans-serif">To:<span class="m_2450306431764467082Apple-converted-space"> </span></span></b><span style="font-family:'Helvetica Neue',sans-serif"><a href="mailto:openid-specs-igov@lists.openid.net" style="color:purple;text-decoration:underline" target="_blank">openid-specs-igov@lists.<wbr>openid.net</a></span><u></u><u></u></div>
</div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
<u></u> <u></u></div>
<div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
The document has a normative reference to a Vectors of Trust “standard”. The so called normative reference is an individual draft and has no standing at this time. <u></u><u></u></div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
<u></u> <u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
The draft <a href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-richer-vectors-of-trust-05" style="color:purple;text-decoration:underline" target="_blank">https://tools.ietf.org/<wbr>html/draft-richer-vectors-of-<wbr>trust-05</a> has been somewhat updated to reflect NIST
800-63-3’s new components, but does not align.<u></u><u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
<u></u> <u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
We have voted “OBJECT” on this draft and would like to see this worked through first.<u></u><u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
<u></u> <u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
— prateek<u></u><u></u></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
<u></u> <u></u></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<div style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
<u></u> <u></u></div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Openid-specs-igov mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Openid-specs-igov@lists.openid.net">Openid-specs-igov@lists.<wbr>openid.net</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-igov" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.openid.net/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-<wbr>igov</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>