<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">VoT intends it to be in as a new claim, “vot”, along with a grounding URL for the vector definitions, “vtr". ACR is meant to be a single value, and it’s not a great fit for the VoT structure in my opinion.<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""> — Justin</div><div class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Feb 24, 2017, at 3:28 PM, Grassi, Paul A. (Fed) via Openid-specs-igov <<a href="mailto:openid-specs-igov@lists.openid.net" class="">openid-specs-igov@lists.openid.net</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class="">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" class="">
<div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">
Per our last meeting I am making many edits (to include some reformatting to look like HEART). In terms of VOT, do we want it as a new claim or embedded within ACR?
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">VOT has the following example <a href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-richer-vectors-of-trust-04#section-4.2" class="">https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-richer-vectors-of-trust-04#section-4.2</a>.</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">I’m open, but I can see some value of ACR perhaps being the underlying country assurance level with VOT standing alone with the appropriate mapping.</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">Paul</div>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br class="">Openid-specs-igov mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:Openid-specs-igov@lists.openid.net" class="">Openid-specs-igov@lists.openid.net</a><br class="">http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-igov<br class=""></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></body></html>