[Openid-specs-igov] VOT

[Grassi, Paul A. (Fed)]

I’m a +1.  I’ll wait the weekend for any dissenters before moving forward.

From: Justin Richer <jricher at mit.edu>
Date: Friday, February 24, 2017 at 4:27 PM
To: "Grassi, Paul A. (Fed)" <paul.grassi at nist.gov>
Cc: Openid-specs-igov <openid-specs-igov at lists.openid.net>
Subject: Re: [Openid-specs-igov] VOT

VoT intends it to be in as a new claim, “vot”, along with a grounding URL for the vector definitions, “vtr". ACR is meant to be a single value, and it’s not a great fit for the VoT structure in my opinion.

 — Justin

On Feb 24, 2017, at 3:28 PM, Grassi, Paul A. (Fed) via Openid-specs-igov <openid-specs-igov at lists.openid.net<mailto:openid-specs-igov at lists.openid.net>> wrote:

Per our last meeting I am making many edits (to include some reformatting to look like HEART).  In terms of VOT, do we want it as a new claim or embedded within ACR?

VOT has the following example https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-richer-vectors-of-trust-04#section-4.2.

I’m open, but I can see some value of ACR perhaps being the underlying country assurance level with VOT standing alone with the appropriate mapping.

Paul
_______________________________________________
Openid-specs-igov mailing list
Openid-specs-igov at lists.openid.net<mailto:Openid-specs-igov at lists.openid.net>
http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-igov

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-igov/attachments/20170224/815d25da/attachment-0001.html>