[Openid-specs-heart] Survey

[Nancy Lush]

Thank you, Thompson.  I agree with all your points.  This is typical of new
initiatives.  It may start with a few that grasp the vision:  If we can make
it a reality there are many benefits.

 

-Nancy

 

From: Openid-specs-heart
[mailto:openid-specs-heart-bounces at lists.openid.net] On Behalf Of Boyd,
Thompson
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2017 6:16 PM
To: openid-specs-heart at lists.openid.net
Subject: [Openid-specs-heart] Survey

 

2   A - Our standards work is incomplete. The standards work is a work in
progress.
1   B - Implementation of our profiles is too expensive. Entities need to
perceive the "value", first.
2   C - Why would a hospital want to make patient-directed access easier?
Need patients as customers. Need to have patient engagement. Patients need
to be in the "center". Patients are part of their careteam.
     D - HEART distracts the patient from the hospital's portal experience.
HEART is more a more enriching experience for the patient. More patient
choice, with more security.
4   E - US regulations are inadequate from a patient rights perspective. We
need to be thinking, internationally.
2   F - NATE and other HIE groups don't see the value of HEART to their
business or mission. It takes time.
1   G - Patient-directed exchange does not allow the patient to pay for API
access. This can be worked out. This may not matter with risk-bearing ACOs
where there is greater financial risk posed on Providers.
3   H - CMS and VA have not endorsed HEART or put it on their road map. CMS
and the VA need to see more examples.
3   I - We have not done enough PR and promotion. Agree, more PR needs to be
done, throughout the various organizations to which we are affiliated as
members.
1   J - People don't know about it and don't understand it's value. It takes
time. More examples need to be available to the Health IT Community and
Stakeholders.
1   K - Patients do not typically do not have access to their data from
which to control an exchange. Agree, systems, need to be in place, for
patients to have more control over who sees their data, as discussed in the
JASON Report.

     L - Other________________________

 

Thompson Boyd

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-heart/attachments/20171107/c7af4d56/attachment.html>