[Openid-specs-heart] Review of HEART FHIR resources on oAuth 2.0

[Nancy Lush]

FHIR resources on oAuth 2.0

1.	In section 2.0, is there a reason why the following resources are
omitted?       

*	AllergyIntolerance
*	Condition
*	Immunization

    I would think the above would be included in a minimum.  I would also
prefer to see the following two:

*	CarePlan
*	Device

 

2.	Section 7

a.	If a system supports security codes, the underlying assumption is
that a given security code transcends resource types.  I would think that if
an ETH scope is specified, it should be applied to all resource types,
unless specifically indicated for only one resource type.

3.	Otherwise, this looks good.  We have added some level of use-case
context that should be helpful to implementers.

 

Thanks much,

Nancy

 

 


 

 


Nancy Lush          

nancy.lush at lgisoftware.com


Lush Group, Inc

Office: (401) 423-9111


28 Narragansett Ave

PO Box 651

www.lgisoftware.com 

Cell:(401) 965-9347


Jamestown, RI 02835

	
	
 




		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-heart/attachments/20170424/e78ac582/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 3006 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-heart/attachments/20170424/e78ac582/attachment.gif>