[Openid-specs-heart] Alice's health resource set
Debbie Bucci
debbucci at gmail.com
Wed Aug 3 21:08:29 UTC 2016
A quick reply -you might agree - Yeah! I am fine starting with
Immunizations. I really do not know - just making guesses based on what
I have read and experimented with thus (2 years behind everyone else) far
with FHIR.
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Adrian Gropper <agropper at healthurl.com>
wrote:
> Debbie, I think we might agree. Please keep in mind that I'm not
> describing scopes - just resources.
>
> a) I call ...patient/abc123/ or anything with ?patient=abc123 as a
> patient-lever resource. I think we are saying the same thing
>
> b) I did not say "ensure", I said "allow". I think we're saying the same
> thing.
>
> c) What's the difference between Any and A? I'm happy to accept your
> alternative.
>
> The rest of your message is about scopes. If we have a consensus on a, b,
> c then we can tart to talk about scopes. Immunization might be a perfectly
> good place to start.
>
> Adrian
>
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Debbie Bucci <debbucci at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Don't agree Adrian
>>
>> a) ALL patient-level resources available as FHIR resources MUST also be
>> provided for registration with a HEART resource server even if the RS
>> decides to bypass the AS or override the AS authorization.
>>
>> wouldn't - patient/*.read technically give you all patient resources
>> available by the FHIR server?
>>
>>
>> b) HEART MUST support data minimization in cases where ALL patient-level
>> FHIR resources are registered with an AS.
>>
>> It's not HEART's responsibility to ensure data minimization as part of
>> the profile- that sentiment could be covered by the pre-conditions
>> stating that RS should; leverage the good work of the privacy principles
>> standards.
>>
>>
>> c) Any resource server MAY choose to register sets of resources in order
>> to improve the user experience at the AS. These resources may or may not
>> all be specified by FHIR. These bundling and definition of these resource
>> sets may be done by HEART or by standards organizations like the HL7 DAF.
>>
>> Perhaps agree with -- slight revision - A resource server MAY choose to
>> register sets of resources in order to improve the user experience at the
>> AS. (perhaps include example(s) her
>>
>>
>>
>> Looking at the Immunization resource, it references location,
>> organization, patient, practitioner and observation.
>> If you authorize only
>>
>> patient / Immunization .read
>> on a GET /Immunizations?patient=abc123 If I understand correctly ...
>> you get there reference to the resource If you want more than the reference
>> of the resource - such as patient demographic information, would we need
>> to include the referenced resources scopes?
>> patient / Patient .read
>> patient / Practitioner .read
>> patient /organization.read
>> patient / observation .read
>> Are their conditional statements we can add to ensure additional info is
>> only on an _include or separate GETS/queries are related to the
>> immunization only?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Adrian Gropper MD
>
> PROTECT YOUR FUTURE - RESTORE Health Privacy!
> HELP us fight for the right to control personal health data.
> DONATE: http://patientprivacyrights.org/donate-2/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-heart/attachments/20160803/2053e981/attachment.html>
More information about the Openid-specs-heart
mailing list