[Openid-specs-heart] Draft HEART Meeting Notes 2015-12-28

[Sarah Squire]

Attending:

Debbie Bucci

Justin Richer

Sarah Squire

Tom Sullivan

Glen Marshall

Thompson Boyd

Dale Moberg

Salvatore D’Agostino

HIMSS

We could meet at a bar or in the exhibit hall. Let’s not go to the trouble
and cost of renting a room. Let’s meet Tuesday afternoon at 5pm.

Tom:

Can we review timelines, deliverables and dates?

Debbie:

We’re in the middle of the waiting period for implementer's drafts. We have
two profiles left - semantic profiles for FHIR and OAuth and FHIR and UMA.
It would be great to have the other two done by March.

Justin:

It’s reasonable to get to a draft state by March as long as we agree it’s
not perfect.

Debbie:

That gives us about ten weeks to go over use cases and flows that could
inform the scope discussion.

Glen:

I want to make sure we don’t get diverted into things that aren’t core.

Debbie:

That’s why I want to talk about the first three use cases and any alternate
flows that they might have.

Tom:

Is there a date when funding runs out? Who does this get presented to?

Justin:

There is no official funding that’s required for the HEART working group to
continue. As long as people are willing to volunteer their time and
attention. OpenID Foundation is volunteer work groups. This work gets
presented to the OpenID Foundation, and it will get voted on. Many
individuals are being funded to participate in the work group, and that
will vary for each person.

Debbie:

At the point that we get implementer’s drafts on all of the specs, I
thought we would shut down, but we shouldn’t shut down because we want
implementers and people doing pilots to have a place to come and ask
questions. We may pare it back to one meeting every two weeks. There will
be a window after March when pilots will be spinning up and we can learn
from them.

Tom:

Does ONC have a formal connection?

Debbie:

ONC is a part of the work group and a member of the OpenID Foundation. We
are acting in a supporting role, not a steering role.

Tom:

Is that the same position that NIST or IDESG would have?

Justin:

NIST has been very explicit that iGov shouldn’t be US-focused or US-driven.
It would keep going even if NIST wandered off.

Justin:

A few of us have joined the argonauts mailing list and talked to them about
some of the specifics about what we’re working on here and take first steps
toward alignment.

Debbie:

My hope going forward is to help out Adrian with his flows and we can focus
on that next, then Glen can come in and build off of that.

Glen:

The timing of that would be good. I’m gone for the next two calls, so I’ll
be back on the 11th and starting to work on that.

Debbie:
I will target getting through the first use cases in January. We’ll target
your use case for February.

Sarah Squire
Engage Identity
http://engageidentity.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-heart/attachments/20151228/dec5baa9/attachment.html>