[Openid-specs-heart] HEART Agenda 2015-07-27

[Adrian Gropper]

I look forward to the discussion.

The shared doc has some 15 comments. Can these be resolved before the call
or will they need some other process for resolution?

I would like to propose the following topic for discussion around this
use-case:

The use-case, as it's written, presumes that there are as many
Authorization Servers as there are Relying Parties (2). Is this consistent
with the HEART charter? Is it practical? Is it necessary for some reason?

Adrian

On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 9:33 PM, Debbie Bucci <debbucci at gmail.com> wrote:

> *Agenda :*
>
>    - Visual Roll call
>    - OAuth  Semantics/Approach - Eve Maler
>    - AOB
>
>
> Note  to  health subject matter experts - fair warning that we are going
> to get in the technical weeds tomorrow.   We plan to go slow - so please
> join and ask questions.  Its important for everyone to have a base
> understanding.
>
> We will continue to focus on the Alice Enrolls with PCP use case but pull
> back a bit and instead of focusing on OAUTH scopes - talk more about the
> semantic  approach we should take; separate the general security
> layer/requirements from FHIR.
>
> Google Doc reference:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IvbdWerdvMuA1dQ-KQvVKqIBrAas7FoenNVUtgpqYrw/edit#heading=h.z5kasfweex6t
>
> We plan to start promptly at 4:00 and final wrap up at 4:55.   We do hope
> you will join us.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openid-specs-heart mailing list
> Openid-specs-heart at lists.openid.net
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-heart
>
>


-- 
Adrian Gropper MD
Ensure Health Information Privacy. Support Patient Privacy Rights.
*http://patientprivacyrights.org/donate-2/*
<http://patientprivacyrights.org/donate-2/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-heart/attachments/20150726/b25da200/attachment.html>