[Openid-specs-heart] Rendered Specs, Issue Tracker

[Justin Richer]

If I’m reading this correctly, anybody with an account on bitbucket should be able to view and edit the wiki, you don’t need special permissions.

But for now, we’re trying to limit access to the main source repository to the chairs and editors. If you want to make a change to the specs themselves, you can fork the repository and create a pull request that we can incorporate the changes that way. There are instructions on how to do that on the main page of the group.

 — Justin, who rules Git repositories with an iron fist

> On Apr 24, 2015, at 3:35 PM, Debbie Bucci <debbucci at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Thanks Justin !  I was able to access the wiki and make updates.  No issues nothing missing.
> For those who/whom(?) would like access - please send me your bitbucket account.  Believe I've add all those that have requested in the past.
> 
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Justin Richer <jricher at mit.edu <mailto:jricher at mit.edu>> wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I’ve set up a few things for the Working Group. The first is the holding page for rendered specifications:
> 
> http://openid.bitbucket.org/HEART/ <http://openid.bitbucket.org/HEART/>
> 
> This has the three currently-started security specs up there, rendered into HTML format, in their current-as-of-today alpha state. It’s a manual process to render and upload new versions, so this won’t always be in sync with the XML files in the repository. We’ll use this page when we’ve got a substantive “revision” to publish. I’m personally in favor of the IETF model where revision numbers are cheap, so let’s not quarrel about what makes a “revision” or not.
> 
> 
> Second, I set up an issue tracker within bitbucket for us to use:
> 
> https://bitbucket.org/openid/heart/issues?status=new&status=open <https://bitbucket.org/openid/heart/issues?status=new&status=open>
> 
> Make sure you tag the appropriate component when reporting an issue.
> 
> 
> Third, I’ve deleted the old mercurial-based repository since it looked like everything was up and running just fine in the new git-based one. I don’t think anyone’s going to notice its absence, but if there’s something in the git repo that’s missing (including the wiki), it will have to get re-added.
> 
>  — Justin
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openid-specs-heart mailing list
> Openid-specs-heart at lists.openid.net <mailto:Openid-specs-heart at lists.openid.net>
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-heart <http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-heart>
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-heart/attachments/20150424/0ae70b31/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 455 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-heart/attachments/20150424/0ae70b31/attachment-0001.asc>