[Openid-specs-heart] Use Case A - Digital identity of the patient acceptable to the VA
Adrian Gropper
agropper at healthurl.com
Mon Jan 12 22:09:00 UTC 2015
Justin,
First and most important: I suggest we call the patient (resource owner)
Alice consistently in all use cases.
Then:
I'm checking on the definition of the patient's digital identity at the VA.
Can we agree that the digital identity could be based on federation with an
IdP or simply Alice presenting to the VA a secure element manufactured (but
not serialized) to an acceptable specification (e.g.: FIDO Alliance U2F).
In other words, the basis of a VA-trusted digital identity does not have to
be an IdP as long as the technology is sourced from a trusted vendor.
Adrian
--
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-heart/attachments/20150112/f23b6f6d/attachment.html>
More information about the Openid-specs-heart
mailing list