[Openid-specs-fastfed] FastFed doc for discussion

McAdams, Darin darinm at amazon.com
Wed May 3 16:08:48 UTC 2017


Just chatted with Mike. He'll be hosting a session today on OTTO schemas

Sent from my mobile

On May 3, 2017, at 8:15 AM, Nat Sakimura <n-sakimura at nri.co.jp<mailto:n-sakimura at nri.co.jp>> wrote:

Perhaps we can try to grab Mike S. today to figure out what can be done re: OTTO.

Nat Sakimura

--
PLEASE READ :This e-mail is confidential and intended for the
named recipient only. If you are not an intended recipient,
please notify the sender  and delete this e-mail.

From: Openid-specs-fastfed [mailto:openid-specs-fastfed-bounces at lists.openid.net] On Behalf Of McAdams, Darin via Openid-specs-fastfed
Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2017 10:35 PM
To: openid-specs-fastfed at lists.openid.net<mailto:openid-specs-fastfed at lists.openid.net>
Subject: Re: [Openid-specs-fastfed] FastFed doc for discussion

Hi all,
Let me know if there's a specific area you'd like to dive into (or you can host the session).

The hot topic I noted yesterday was an open question around alignment with OTTO from Kantara, especially the representation of metadata. Since I know little of OTTO, will try to find someone from that group to volunteer.

Sent from my mobile

On May 2, 2017, at 11:18 PM, Dick Hardt <dick.hardt at gmail.com<mailto:dick.hardt at gmail.com>> wrote:
For those of us at IIW, we had a session today, and will have another session tomorrow on FastFed.

On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 5:27 PM, ????? via Openid-specs-fastfed <openid-specs-fastfed at lists.openid.net<mailto:openid-specs-fastfed at lists.openid.net>> wrote:
Hello Darin,

apologize for less contribution.

>From my experience, in some case we have to consider for a scenario
that supporting multiple instances of the same SP for a single IdP
instance. Because almost all enterprise have dev/qa/prod instances for
the same applications, but in some case they do not want to have
multiple instances of IdP. For example, my customer are using G Suite
dev/prod instances which were configured SSO with single Azure AD.

So my proposal for your question on page 8, at least application name
should be obtained from fastfed-discovery endpoint, like G Suite for
dev, so that admins recognize SP's instance.

Regards,
Naohiro

2017-04-30 12:06 GMT+09:00 McAdams, Darin via Openid-specs-fastfed
<openid-specs-fastfed at lists.openid.net<mailto:openid-specs-fastfed at lists.openid.net>>:
> Hi all,
>
> Doc attached, including a set of Open Issues that may be good for
> discussions. See many of you next week.
>
> -Darin
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openid-specs-fastfed mailing list
> Openid-specs-fastfed at lists.openid.net<mailto:Openid-specs-fastfed at lists.openid.net>
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-fastfed
>
_______________________________________________
Openid-specs-fastfed mailing list
Openid-specs-fastfed at lists.openid.net<mailto:Openid-specs-fastfed at lists.openid.net>
http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-fastfed



--
Subscribe to the HARDTWARE<http://hardtware.com/> mail list to learn about projects I am working on!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-fastfed/attachments/20170503/680663a4/attachment.html>


More information about the Openid-specs-fastfed mailing list