<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:x="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:excel" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Aptos;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;
mso-ligatures:standardcontextual;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#467886;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="#467886" vlink="#96607D" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">The proposed errata changes to FAPI 1.0 Advanced are at
<a href="https://openid.bitbucket.io/fapi/openid-financial-api-part-2-1_0.html">https://openid.bitbucket.io/fapi/openid-financial-api-part-2-1_0.html</a> but not yet published to openid.net/specs/. I think it makes sense to do so.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">I’ll note that the corresponding errata updates to OpenID Connect Core and CIBA Core have been published there. See
<a href="https://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-core-1_0-36.html">https://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-core-1_0-36.html</a> and
<a href="https://openid.net/specs/openid-client-initiated-backchannel-authentication-core-1_0-06.html">
https://openid.net/specs/openid-client-initiated-backchannel-authentication-core-1_0-06.html</a>.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Is the working group supportive of publishing draft 10 to openid.net/specs/?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">I do have one editorial question. Why is it that the title in
<a href="https://bitbucket.org/openid/fapi/raw/92a88dfb26fc6d95f22f305f85eb2308fec0f5f3/FAPI_1.0/openid-financial-api-part-2-1_0.md">
the source</a> is<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"">title: FAPI security profile 1.0 - Part 2: Advanced - draft 10 incorporating errata set 1<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">whereas the title in <a href="https://openid.bitbucket.io/fapi/openid-financial-api-part-2-1_0.html">
the draft</a> is<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt">FAPI security profile 1.0 - Part 2: Advanced - draft 10 incorporating errata set 1 - 1<o:p></o:p></span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">(with the extra “ – 1” at the end)?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> Thanks,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> -- Mike<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>