<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>I support Baseline and Advanced.<br>
    </p>
    <p>At the potential risk of opening another rabbit hole (sorry again
      Dave! :)), I'd also like to suggest consideration for the adoption
      of semantic versioning (<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://semver.org/">https://semver.org/</a>) as this is a widely
      understood convention for implementer's (ie. software
      engineering). For published versions of the standard this would be
      x.y format (or simply x) while WG internal changes prior to
      release could utilise x.y.z. All changes within a major version
      (x) would be backward compatible meaning changes beyond initial .0
      would be constrained to MAY, SHOULD, OPTIONAL and RECOMMENDED
      clauses or a Brand New Profile (I've used "Extreme" in examples).<br>
    </p>
    <p>By adopting this through to Certification Suite, tests could be
      associated with version numbers (rather than specific references
      to clauses) and release notes per version would be used to
      highlight clause additions/numbering changes etc. On this basis
      certification could be given for "FAPI 1 (Profile)", "FAPI 2
      (Profile)" with implementer's having the choice to potentially
      further specify certification indicating they meet "FAPI 2.1
      (Profile)".<br>
    </p>
    <p>Prior to considering a ticket creation I'd be interested in the
      mailing lists thoughts on this. By way of example this would
      result in an initial starting point of:<br>
    </p>
    <p>FAPI 1.0 Read<br>
      FAPI 1.0 Read/Write<br>
      FAPI 2.0 Baseline<br>
      FAPI 2.0 Advanced</p>
    <p>As functionality is added (primarily in 2.y I would assume) this
      would involve the WG using full x.y.z format then releasing x.y
      version. From the current state where there is already a v1 (so
      it's off limits) the "typical" initial approach would be to use
      the arbitrarily non conformant v0 or v99. Alternatives could be
      the use of -alpha pre releases but at least personally I've found
      this problematic. Since pictures are often more explanatory here's
      a rough starting point of how this would flow. I've deliberately
      avoided talking about FAPI 3 (ie. breaking changes post FAPI 2) as
      this seems like a "Future Stu problem". :)<br>
    </p>
    <p><img src="cid:part1.964DC5D9.06E7E90B@biza.io" alt=""></p>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 21/2/20 12:30 am, Daniel Fett via
      Openid-specs-fapi wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:fd1021d6-742d-7207-31f5-86d86409e83d@danielfett.de">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Yes, it should be Baseline.</div>
      <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
      </div>
      <div class="moz-cite-prefix">-Daniel<br>
      </div>
      <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
      </div>
      <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 20.02.20 um 14:19 schrieb
        n-sakimura:<br>
      </div>
      <blockquote type="cite"
        cite="mid:AD1E7003-B824-47F5-9883-814A7B405C6C@cu.nri.co.jp">
        <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
          charset=UTF-8">
        Thanks. That sounds good, though the name that was talked about
        in the room in the F2F London was “Baseline” instead of
        “Basic”. 
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>Best, </div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>Nat<br>
          <br>
          <div dir="ltr">
            <div><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">PLEASE
                READ:This e-mail is confidential and intended for</span></div>
            <div><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">the
                named recipient only. If you are not an intended
                recipient,<br>
                please notify the sender and delete this e-mail.</span></div>
          </div>
          <div dir="ltr"><br>
            <blockquote type="cite">2020/02/19 15:59、Daniel Fett via
              Openid-specs-fapi <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
                href="mailto:openid-specs-fapi@lists.openid.net"
                moz-do-not-send="true"><openid-specs-fapi@lists.openid.net></a>のメール:<br>
              <br>
            </blockquote>
          </div>
          <blockquote type="cite">
            <div dir="ltr">
              <div class="moz-cite-prefix">+1</div>
              <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
              </div>
              <div class="moz-cite-prefix">FWIW, I'm currently preparing
                a first draft for 2.0. I currently expect 2.0 to consist
                of separate documents for the attacker model, the two
                profiles, grant management and potentially CIBA.</div>
              <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
              </div>
              <div class="moz-cite-prefix">-Daniel<br>
              </div>
              <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
              </div>
              <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 19.02.20 um 16:34 schrieb
                Dave Tonge via Openid-specs-fapi:<br>
              </div>
              <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP-T6TQQZ3_jyEKSL6Mpt-6rwO4UF_nuQ0i2+qAg2a2_gAwZyg@mail.gmail.com">
                <div dir="ltr">
                  <div class="gmail_default"
                    style="font-family:trebuchet ms,sans-serif"> Dear WG<br
                      clear="all">
                  </div>
                  <div class="gmail_default"
                    style="font-family:trebuchet ms,sans-serif"> <br>
                  </div>
                  <div class="gmail_default"
                    style="font-family:trebuchet ms,sans-serif"> We had
                    a good discussion on the call today around the next
                    steps for FAPI and came to the following conclusion:</div>
                  <div class="gmail_default"
                    style="font-family:trebuchet ms,sans-serif"> <br>
                  </div>
                  <div class="gmail_default"
                    style="font-family:trebuchet ms,sans-serif"> 1. We
                    should use versioning to indicate that the FAPI
                    evolution is a new major version</div>
                  <div class="gmail_default"
                    style="font-family:trebuchet ms,sans-serif"> 2. We
                    need to keep support for the current FAPI-R and
                    FAPI-RW for some time as they have been implemented
                    by many people and have a good suite of conformance
                    tests.</div>
                  <div class="gmail_default"
                    style="font-family:trebuchet ms,sans-serif"> 3.
                    There were no objections to the names of "Basic" and
                    "Advanced"</div>
                  <div class="gmail_default"
                    style="font-family:trebuchet ms,sans-serif"> <br>
                  </div>
                  <div class="gmail_default"
                    style="font-family:trebuchet ms,sans-serif"> With
                    this in mind we propose:</div>
                  <div class="gmail_default"
                    style="font-family:trebuchet ms,sans-serif"> <br>
                  </div>
                  <div class="gmail_default"
                    style="font-family:trebuchet ms,sans-serif"> 1. The
                    current "Financial-grade API - Part 1: Read-Only API
                    Security Profile" (FAPI Read) spec should be changed
                    to "<span
                      style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">Financial-grade
                      API 1.0 - Part 1: Read-Only API Security Profile
                      (FAPI 1.0 Read)</span></div>
                  <div class="gmail_default"
                    style="font-family:trebuchet ms,sans-serif"> 2. The
                    current "Financial-grade API - Part 2: Read and
                    Write API Security Profile" (FAPI Read/Write) spec
                    should be changed to "<span
                      style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">Financial-grade
                      API 1.0 - Part 2: Read and Write API Security
                      Profile (FAPI 1.0 Read/Write)</span><span
                      style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"><br>
                    </span></div>
                  <div class="gmail_default"
                    style="font-family:trebuchet ms,sans-serif"> <span
                      style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">3.
                      We introduce two new documents:</span></div>
                  <div class="gmail_default"
                    style="font-family:trebuchet ms,sans-serif"> <span
                      style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"> - </span><span
                      style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">Financial-grade
                      API 2.0 - Basic Security Profile" (FAPI 2.0 Basic)</span></div>
                  <div class="gmail_default"
                    style="font-family:trebuchet ms,sans-serif"> <span
                      style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"> - </span><span
                      style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">Financial-grade
                      API 2.0 - Advanced Security Profile" (FAPI 2.0
                      Advanced)</span><span
                      style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"><br>
                    </span></div>
                  <div class="gmail_default"
                    style="font-family:trebuchet ms,sans-serif"> <span
                      style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"><br>
                    </span></div>
                  <div class="gmail_default" style="">This will allow us
                    to maintain the existing specs (and their associated
                    conformance suites). It will also allow the
                    evolution of FAPI that we've been discussing to move
                    ahead - including with new names to signal use-cases
                    beyond financial read and financial read/write. The
                    new documents (2.0 Basic and 2.0 Advanced) can be
                    re-ordered and won't need to maintain backwards
                    compatibility to the numbering of sections and list
                    items.</div>
                  <div class="gmail_default" style=""><br>
                  </div>
                  <div class="gmail_default" style="">It would be good
                    to get feedback from the WG about this proposal as
                    we are keen to move forward.</div>
                  <div class="gmail_default" style=""><br>
                  </div>
                  <div class="gmail_default" style="">Thanks</div>
                  <div class="gmail_default" style=""><br>
                  </div>
                  <div class="gmail_default" style="">Dave</div>
                  <div class="gmail_default" style=""><br>
                  </div>
                  -- <br>
                  <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"
                    data-smartmail="gmail_signature">
                    <div dir="ltr">
                      <div dir="ltr">
                        <div dir="ltr">
                          <div dir="ltr">
                            <div dir="ltr">
                              <div dir="ltr">
                                <div
                                  style="font-size:1em;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.4">
                                  <div
                                    style="color:rgb(97,97,97);font-family:"Open
Sans";font-size:14px;font-weight:normal;line-height:21px">
                                    <div
style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:0.925em;line-height:1.4;color:rgb(220,41,30);font-weight:bold">
                                      <div
style="font-size:14px;font-weight:normal;color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:lato,"opensans",arial,sans-serif;line-height:normal">
                                        <div
style="color:rgb(0,164,183);font-weight:bold;font-size:1em;line-height:1.4">
                                          <div
                                            style="font-weight:400;color:rgb(51,51,51);line-height:normal">
                                            <div
style="color:rgb(0,164,183);font-weight:bold;font-size:1em;line-height:1.4">Dave
                                              Tonge</div>
                                            <div
                                              style="font-size:0.8125em;line-height:1.4">
                                              <div class="gmail_default"
style="font-family:"trebuchet ms",sans-serif"> FAPI Co-Chair</div>
                                              <br>
                                            </div>
                                          </div>
                                        </div>
                                      </div>
                                    </div>
                                  </div>
                                </div>
                              </div>
                            </div>
                          </div>
                        </div>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                </div>
                <br>
                <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
                <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
Openid-specs-fapi mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Openid-specs-fapi@lists.openid.net" moz-do-not-send="true">Openid-specs-fapi@lists.openid.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-fapi" moz-do-not-send="true">http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-fapi</a>
</pre>
              </blockquote>
              <p><br>
              </p>
              <span>_______________________________________________</span><br>
              <span>Openid-specs-fapi mailing list</span><br>
              <span><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
                  href="mailto:Openid-specs-fapi@lists.openid.net"
                  moz-do-not-send="true">Openid-specs-fapi@lists.openid.net</a></span><br>
              <span><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
                  href="http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-fapi"
                  moz-do-not-send="true">http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-fapi</a></span><br>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      <p><br>
      </p>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
Openid-specs-fapi mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Openid-specs-fapi@lists.openid.net">Openid-specs-fapi@lists.openid.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-fapi">http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-fapi</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>