[Openid-specs-fapi] A couple of asks to the WG as an editor

[Ralph Bragg]

Hi Nat,

I’m supportive of you just fixing the references preferably. Will review the PR.

Kind Regards,
Ralph


Ralph Bragg

Chief Technology Officer

M.



+447890130559

T.



+44 20 4583 6770

ralph.bragg at raidiam.com<mailto:ralph.bragg at raidiam.com>

From: Openid-specs-fapi <openid-specs-fapi-bounces at lists.openid.net> on behalf of Nat Sakimura via Openid-specs-fapi <openid-specs-fapi at lists.openid.net>
Date: Thursday, 30 October 2025 at 5:19 am
To: FAPI Working Group List <openid-specs-fapi at lists.openid.net>
Cc: Nat Sakimura <nat at sakimura.org>
Subject: [Openid-specs-fapi] A couple of asks to the WG as an editor

Hi FAPI WG.

I am writing this not as a co-chair, but as an editor of FAPI1.

We are in the process of aligning the text with the ISO comments we received for FAPI1.

https://bitbucket.org/openid/fapi/pull-requests/548

Is a bit of shuffle around of the clauses and fixing broken links etc.
This is a fairly big PR but quite simple, so if you guys could just check it and approve it, it would be great. That will cause less concern for me to get into conflicts.

The second ask is to give me a mandate to fix trivial things, like change a RFC to an RFC etc. Creating PRs for each of those comments will create more work fo you and me. Just directly fixing them would be more productive.

Best regards.

Nat Sakimura
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-fapi/attachments/20251029/ea950ea1/attachment-0001.htm>