[Openid-specs-fapi] Issue #801: FAPI1: [ISO/IEC 25791-2 Review Comments] Add RP and definition to clause 4 (openid/fapi)
Hodari McClain
issues-reply at bitbucket.org
Wed Oct 22 06:28:04 UTC 2025
New issue 801: FAPI1: [ISO/IEC 25791-2 Review Comments] Add RP and definition to clause 4
https://bitbucket.org/openid/fapi/issues/801/fapi1-iso-iec-25791-2-review-comments-add
Hodari McClain:
* Member Body / National Committee: JP/19-017
* Type: Editorial
* Subclause\(s\): 5.1.2, 4
* Comments: The abbreviation RP in the note “JARM can be used to protect OpenID Connect authentication responses. In this case, the OpenID RP would use response type code” is not used before.
* Proposed Change: Modify “RP” as “Relying Party \(RP\)”.
* WG Accept / Reject: Partially accepted.
Add RP to clause 4.
There are other abbreviations that are not listed in clause 4, so add them as well.
More information about the Openid-specs-fapi
mailing list