[Openid-specs-fapi] Issue #691: General (Review title) (openid/fapi)

[Brian Campbell]

New issue 691: General (Review title)
https://bitbucket.org/openid/fapi/issues/691/general-review-title

Brian Campbell:

There are several subsection in the FAPI 2.0 Attacker Model with the title, "General \(Review title\)" that generally need to have their title reviewed. At the time of creating this issue they are:

[5.1](https://openid.bitbucket.io/fapi/fapi-2_0-attacker-model.html#section-5.1).  [General \(_Review title_\)](https://openid.bitbucket.io/fapi/fapi-2_0-attacker-model.html#name-general-review-title)

[7.1](https://openid.bitbucket.io/fapi/fapi-2_0-attacker-model.html#section-7.1).  [General \(_Review title_\)](https://openid.bitbucket.io/fapi/fapi-2_0-attacker-model.html#name-general-review-title-2)

[8.1](https://openid.bitbucket.io/fapi/fapi-2_0-attacker-model.html#section-8.1).  [General \(_Review title_\)](https://openid.bitbucket.io/fapi/fapi-2_0-attacker-model.html#name-general-review-title-3)

Although the subsection headings were apparently added to "[Align Attacker Model with ISO document structure and format](https://bitbucket.org/openid/fapi/commits/cfde6d9589031bf5b3fe7bd88f23023b0384c377)" they are unnecessary and detract from the overall quality of the document. I’d argue that the review of the title of the general subsections should result in their removal.   

‌

‌

‌