[Openid-specs-fapi] Issue #690: 5.1.1. Introduction recommends Grant Management but the maturity level of the document makes it inappropriate to recommend it in the FIANL specification (openid/fapi)

[Ralph Bragg]

Hi,

I would prefer that we leave it in somewhere because of the reasons that Jospeh outlined. Unfortunately because we haven’t prioritised this spec collectively, the newest open banking ecosystem (UAE) will be sticking with a consents api for external grant management. They will use RAR for the initial grant creation.

If this specification was more mature and has wider implementations then it potentially would have been adopted so pushing this forward in someway would be preferred.

RB


Ralph Bragg

Chief Technology Officer

M.



+447890130559

T.



0203 148 6609

ralph.bragg at raidiam.com<mailto:ralph.bragg at raidiam.com>



________________________________
From: Openid-specs-fapi <openid-specs-fapi-bounces at lists.openid.net> on behalf of Nat via Openid-specs-fapi <openid-specs-fapi at lists.openid.net>
Sent: Thursday, May 2, 2024 1:18:01 AM
To: openid-specs-fapi at lists.openid.net <openid-specs-fapi at lists.openid.net>
Cc: Nat <issues-reply at bitbucket.org>
Subject: [Openid-specs-fapi] Issue #690: 5.1.1. Introduction recommends Grant Management but the maturity level of the document makes it inappropriate to recommend it in the FIANL specification (openid/fapi)

New issue 690: 5.1.1. Introduction recommends Grant Management but the maturity level of the document makes it inappropriate to recommend it in the FIANL specification
https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbitbucket.org%2Fopenid%2Ffapi%2Fissues%2F690%2F511-introduction-recommends-grant&data=05%7C02%7CRalph.bragg%40raidiam.com%7C1e6d310fc65a43918adf08dc69f1e9f0%7Cecb51cf427f1440bbed550fc2ffbea8d%7C0%7C0%7C638501734946110813%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Kn3lDurhWLi3E4RrLOCSErlPWaf0kBpOysMP1VMhHL8%3D&reserved=0<https://bitbucket.org/openid/fapi/issues/690/511-introduction-recommends-grant>

Nat Sakimura:

On the 2024-05-01 call, Brian pointed out that recommending/referring to Grant Management, whose maturity level and progress activity are low, is inappropriate. The PR 487 [https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbitbucket.org%2Fopenid%2Ffapi%2Fpull-requests%2F487&data=05%7C02%7CRalph.bragg%40raidiam.com%7C1e6d310fc65a43918adf08dc69f1e9f0%7Cecb51cf427f1440bbed550fc2ffbea8d%7C0%7C0%7C638501734946120889%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=kw6%2Ff1HpQOkNZv8bBxobjF2STgKz40eO3BVp8VStIU4%3D&reserved=0](https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbitbucket.org%2Fopenid%2Ffapi%2Fpull-requests%2F487&data=05%7C02%7CRalph.bragg%40raidiam.com%7C1e6d310fc65a43918adf08dc69f1e9f0%7Cecb51cf427f1440bbed550fc2ffbea8d%7C0%7C0%7C638501734946130874%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=xSF0BcajdJHvU8njA35LqIEZNnAPKnBP97t98u9TXvI%3D&reserved=0<https://bitbucket.org/openid/fapi/pull-requests/487>) suggests removing the bullet that mentions Grant Management and the reference from the Informative Reference section.

There were several counter-arguments for it:

* Giving more prominence to Grant Management will likely encourage implementations, thereby accelerating the development of the spec \(Joseph\)
* Just a single spec cannot build the ecosystem but ecosystems need the collection of specs, and guidance like this is valuable \(Dima\)

The idea of creating a living document like “FAPI Framework Overview” and moving the paragraph there was suggested by Riffat.

‌

_______________________________________________
Openid-specs-fapi mailing list
Openid-specs-fapi at lists.openid.net
https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.openid.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fopenid-specs-fapi&data=05%7C02%7CRalph.bragg%40raidiam.com%7C1e6d310fc65a43918adf08dc69f1e9f0%7Cecb51cf427f1440bbed550fc2ffbea8d%7C0%7C0%7C638501734946138512%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=R1N1GHuGM1C7xtNg0ea7qCMOmXdAo2G4pQKa4gJy8G4%3D&reserved=0<https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-fapi>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-fapi/attachments/20240501/60c554cf/attachment.html>