[Openid-specs-fapi] Issue #690: 5.1.1. Introduction recommends Grant Management but the maturity level of the document makes it inappropriate to recommend it in the FIANL specification (openid/fapi)

[Nat]

New issue 690: 5.1.1. Introduction recommends Grant Management but the maturity level of the document makes it inappropriate to recommend it in the FIANL specification
https://bitbucket.org/openid/fapi/issues/690/511-introduction-recommends-grant

Nat Sakimura:

On the 2024-05-01 call, Brian pointed out that recommending/referring to Grant Management, whose maturity level and progress activity are low, is inappropriate. The PR 487 [https://bitbucket.org/openid/fapi/pull-requests/487](https://bitbucket.org/openid/fapi/pull-requests/487) suggests removing the bullet that mentions Grant Management and the reference from the Informative Reference section. 

There were several counter-arguments for it: 

* Giving more prominence to Grant Management will likely encourage implementations, thereby accelerating the development of the spec \(Joseph\)
* Just a single spec cannot build the ecosystem but ecosystems need the collection of specs, and guidance like this is valuable \(Dima\)

The idea of creating a living document like “FAPI Framework Overview” and moving the paragraph there was suggested by Riffat.  

‌