[Openid-specs-fapi] Issue #679: (ed) replace (this) specification with (this) document (openid/fapi)

Nat issues-reply at bitbucket.org
Wed Mar 13 09:58:04 UTC 2024

Previous message (by thread): [Openid-specs-fapi] Issue #678: (ed) Privacy considerations is a top level clause while Security considerations is a second level subclause (openid/fapi)
Next message (by thread): [Openid-specs-fapi] Issue #680: (ed) " (Review title)" must be removed (openid/fapi)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

New issue 679: (ed) replace (this) specification with (this) document
https://bitbucket.org/openid/fapi/issues/679/ed-replace-this-specification-with-this

Nat Sakimura:

Per ISO Directive part 2, “this document” is supposed to be used as the self-reference.

Previous message (by thread): [Openid-specs-fapi] Issue #678: (ed) Privacy considerations is a top level clause while Security considerations is a second level subclause (openid/fapi)
Next message (by thread): [Openid-specs-fapi] Issue #680: (ed) " (Review title)" must be removed (openid/fapi)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Openid-specs-fapi mailing list