[Openid-specs-fapi] Issue #513: Is missing "Privacy consideration" OK? (openid/fapi)

Nat issues-reply at bitbucket.org
Mon Jul 4 14:43:15 UTC 2022

Previous message (by thread): [Openid-specs-fapi] Issue #512: Protocol run identifier such as nonce or PKCE should be required (openid/fapi)
Next message (by thread): [Openid-specs-fapi] Issue #514: Five occurence of "this draft" need to be changed to "this document" (openid/fapi)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

New issue 513: Is missing "Privacy consideration" OK?
https://bitbucket.org/openid/fapi/issues/513/is-missing-privacy-consideration-ok

Nat Sakimura:

The draft is missing “Privacy consideration”. Do we need to add one?

Previous message (by thread): [Openid-specs-fapi] Issue #512: Protocol run identifier such as nonce or PKCE should be required (openid/fapi)
Next message (by thread): [Openid-specs-fapi] Issue #514: Five occurence of "this draft" need to be changed to "this document" (openid/fapi)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Openid-specs-fapi mailing list