[Openid-specs-fapi] Issue #471: Resolve '?' in FAPI1 vs FAPI2 differences table (openid/fapi)

josephheenan issues-reply at bitbucket.org
Fri Feb 4 18:23:52 UTC 2022


New issue 471: Resolve '?' in FAPI1 vs FAPI2 differences table
https://bitbucket.org/openid/fapi/issues/471/resolve-in-fapi1-vs-fapi2-differences

Joseph Heenan:

‌

We should probably do something about the '?' in this table:

![](https://bitbucket.org/repo/K7gLBb/images/1218555131-image.png)
I’d suggest we can say something like “PAR request uris have a limited lifetime” \(and adding a ‘shall’ clause with a limit on lifetime as I think the PAR RFC doesn’t have any normative language on this point?\).



More information about the Openid-specs-fapi mailing list